Scared, or scary?
India is supposed to be a country of sexually repressed people, isn’t it? And the US of A is supposed to be sexually liberated. The swingin sixties and all the rest of it. But just look how scared Liberty University* seems to be of sexuality and any expression thereof.
Even more scary (or is it funny in a hysterical, over the top kind of way?) is how ‘abortion’ and ‘Two or more individuals of the opposite sex together in hotel/motel room without proper permission’ are seemingly considered worse than racial/sexual harassment. So also witchcraft, and life-threatening behaviour. And a whole lot of other stuff: you have to read it to believe it!
Thank God I didn’t go there - I’d have racked up around $1000 in fines, and I was a good girl in college. Really. I wonder what would’ve happened to… ahem, okay, no names on blog.
*Named for a town, apparently, not a value.
Filed under: Feminism, General stuff
why the emphasis?
Hardly representative of American education, isn’t this?
Mr. Nair: Bad question.
Andre: Of course it isn’t! I hope not! But you must admit it’s scary. Or funny. Both?!
Both, I think. Though I’m inclined towards scary. But aren’t such things common? Well, not common. Widespread. Certainly India has its share of freak religious/educational institutions.
Oh, and I liked the asterisked footnote.
Fair point. Doesn’t make it any easier to accept.